> And since "print" very often means a PDF that's also available online, has there been any progress on tagged PDF support in pdflatex or a similar tool? This is important for accessibility. In more complex/worse cases, LaTeX can do things that HTML in a browser can't reasonably do at all for print, even with CSS. In the simplest/best case, LaTeX will simply produce nicer-looking results for print. What typesetting capabilities it supports are designed by committees, and its primary purpose has always been screen display, never print. HTML is at most 29 years old, and has only supported typesetting of any kind for a fraction of that. LaTeX is techniques and heuristics from hundreds of years of typesetting for print, codified into a program. > Why is LaTeX unambiguously better for print? Is it just the support for math notation, or is there more to it? >I've never found anything that introduces the necessary matrix calculus for deep learning clearly, correctly, and accessibly - so I'm happy that this now exists. (We tried Katex, Mathjax, and pretty much everything else but nothing rendered everything properly).
He shared my passion for making something that anyone could read on any device to such an extent that he ended up creating a new tool for generating fast, mobile-friendly math-heavy texts. >But more importantly - I need to mention that Terence Parr did nearly all the work on this. Here to answer any questions or comments that you have. It was referenced by Jeremy Howard in a HN comment on the submission for their "Matrix Calculus for Deep Learning " HN submission of 18 days ago : (In addition / As an alternative) to Pandoc, has anyone tried Bookish by Terrence Parr of ANTLR fame?